Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Entwicklung und Humanitäre Hilfe
Global Voices (EN)
The overarching message from this year’s Munich Security Conference was clear: climate change is not a backdrop to security or humanitarian work, it is part of the operating environment. The question now is whether we can act on what we already know before the next shock removes our room to manoeuvre. Strategic preparedness begins with closing the gap between institutions that already possess much of the necessary data and improving the synchronization between foresight and decision-making.
Commentary by Koko Warner
At the Munich Security Conference this year, the conversation kept circling back to a new understanding of stability. No matter which discussion or session, whether about security, energy, supply chains, humanitarian access, or finance, participants spoke of connected pressures. Climate stress, geopolitical tension, and humanitarian fragility now form a single landscape of risk.
What may have been abstract and distant intersections between climate and security have become immediate, shaping not only policy debates but daily operational choices. Energy systems reliant on fair and open markets are now disrupted by attack, politics, and extreme weather. Far-flung global supply chains designed for efficiency must prove they can withstand shocks. Climate risk, long treated as a background concern, is now a direct influence on conflict, displacement, and financial stability.
On the eve of the conference, an expert group gathered at Munich Re Foundation to discuss location‑based climate intelligence and humanitarian preparedness. The discussion focused on how to keep critical systems functioning when shocks come faster and compound across systems. The meeting captured a wider mood at Munich, the sense that preparedness is not just a logistical question. It is a strategic one.
Operational readiness depends on critical functions like electricity, fuel, water, transport, data, and financial liquidity. These are the arteries of both humanitarian and civilian life, and they are under strain. Ports, coastal bases, and energy infrastructure are exposed to rising seas and stronger storms even as they face geopolitical threats. Adaptation, in this sense, becomes a condition for continuity.
Civilian systems show the same pattern. Electricity demand is surging upwards with data centers for artificial intelligence, while heatwaves and storms test grid reliability. Participants in Munich noted that distributed and renewable power can strengthen resilience and reduce energy dependencies, but only if built on trust and local inclusion. Communities must see direct benefit and clear communication. Without that, even well‑designed systems can lose social acceptance.
For humanitarian actors in the system coordinated by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, these converging pressures are not new, but the pace has changed. Drought, floods, and extreme heat already stretch livelihoods and food systems. Now, multiple shocks coincide more frequently. Political upheaval, disrupted trade routes, and resource scarcity amplify each other. The result is that crises arrive less like isolated emergencies and more like continuous stress.
In this context, preparedness is not only about protection; it is about preserving choice. Predictive tools such as seasonal forecasts, flood mapping, satellite monitoring have made it possible to act earlier. Relief agencies pre‑position supplies before roads are cut, reducing cost and disruption. Each day saved before a crisis compounds into days of stability afterward. Innovative partnerships with humanitarian actors like the World Food Programme and others with private sector foundations, such as Airbus and Munich Re Foundation, have shown how this can work.
Decision‑makers require information that translates directly into action: what to reinforce, where to pre‑position, how to keep vital systems running. Several challenges complicate crisis management:
Across sectors, timing has emerged as the hardest frontier of preparedness. Timeliness of delivery is a form of protection. Crises unfold in real time. Humanitarian agencies pivot in seasons and lifesaving needs rise faster than funding, and resources are still released too late. Finance ministries negotiate annual budgets and economic cycles. Finance remains a persistent constraint not only as a question of how much finance but the timing of budgeting and releasing funds for strategic purposes. Security planners work on multi‑year horizons. Climate models project decades into the future. None of these timeframes align neatly. The challenge is not knowledge, but pace. In this environment, anticipatory finance that uses trigger‑based mechanisms unlock funds when thresholds are met. Pre-arranged finance helps ensure that early warning is followed with action.
Trust also threads through all of this. Preparedness measures, from early action to resilient infrastructure, depend on public support and political consent. People are more willing to sustain preventive investments when they see concrete benefits: water systems that keep working through drought, hospitals that stay powered during heatwaves, recovery that starts while memory is still fresh. Transparency about what works, and what fails, builds that trust over time.
Aligning climate intelligence with financial triggers, humanitarian planning, and security priorities is not a technical exercise. It is a test of political will. Institutions already possess much of the data they need; what is missing is the synchronization between foresight and decision. Strategic preparedness begins by closing that gap. Climate intelligence, if used well, can bridge that gap. Real‑time observation, loss databases, and risk models are improving rapidly. Tools once designed for insurers and investors are beginning to guide humanitarian operations and public decisions.
Leaving Munich, there was a sense of realism. Climate impacts are accelerating just as global politics tightens and resources thin out. Energy and supply systems are being reassessed under pressure; humanitarian agencies must act faster with fewer buffers. The conversation has shifted from abstract warning to strategic readiness and how to stay functional in an unsettled world.
The overarching message from Munich was clear: climate change is not a backdrop to security or humanitarian work, it is part of the operating environment. The question now is whether we can act on what we already know before the next shock removes our room to manoeuvre. Preparedness, in the end, is not about predicting the future, it is about strategic preparedness.
Dr. Koko Warner directs University of Pennsylvania’s International Climate Observatory and is a recognized leader in people-centered, data-driven approaches to addressing adverse climate impacts on humanitarian crises and economic development. Koko spearheaded institutional transformation in how data is used to deliver actionable insight to save lives, field-relevant analytics to deliver solutions to displacement and deepen insights about global climate trends, and inform preparedness and anticipatory action through strategic foresight. As inaugural Director of IOM’s Global Data Institute (GDI), she led teams that won the 2024 Innovation in Data Award and garnered recognition for IOM as the main provider of displacement and other mobility data for the UN system.
Previously, Dr. Warner directed some of the first empirical research on climate migration at the United Nations University. She pioneered climate resilience financing as Executive Director of the Munich Climate Insurance Initiative, and oversaw loss and damage policy, and adaptation planning at UNFCCC. She has been a lead author in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th assessment cycles).
The International Science Council recognized Koko Warner as among the top 20 women in climate policy. Her work has focused on practical, system-wide approaches that connect data to action, and migration policy to the achievement of well being in the Global South and Global North.
Inspired by Tom Fletcher’s statement of commitment to the humanitarian community when he resumed his position as Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator (OCHA) in November 2024, this channel provides expert views and impulses that highlight the current importance of listening, efficiency, ou
